11/2/2022 0 Comments Cinebench r15 vs r20Otherwise, Tum_Apisak unearthed an entry of a 6.12 GHz record set by Lucky_Noob, this time under LN2 alas, the latter is now deleted. Overclocked 6.12 GHzįinally, note that on Cinebench R15, the Ryzen 5 5600X was also overclocked to 4.95 GHz although air cooled under these conditions, he obtained a single-core score of 272 points. Recently, a Rocket Lake-S processor achieved very promising scores on UserBenchmark. The site WCCFTech made the two histograms above for easy comparison.Ĭonsidering all these results, it is hoped for Intel – and consumers – that its eleventh generation, Rocket Lake-S, will be up to the task. In single-core, the Ryzen 5 5600X is therefore ahead of all its rivals in multicore, it follows the Ryzen 7 and Core i7, yet equipped with two additional cores. On Cinebench R20, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X achieves scores of 609 and 4,746 points. Beaten in single-core, the Ryzen 7 3700X, equipped with 8 cores / 16 threads, wins in multicores. It is also 22% and 25% faster than its predecessor, the Ryzen 5 3600XT. Thus, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is 25% faster in single-core and 42% more efficient in multicore than the Core i5-10600K from Intel. With Cinebench R15, the Xeon W-3175X clocks in just under 3.6 percent faster. Remember that the Intel Cores mentioned here have TDP of 125 W against 65 W for the Ryzen 5. The shorter bars are Cinebench R15 (also freshly run on the machines), while the longer bars are Cinebench R20. On the AMD side, the Ryzen 5 3600XT tops out at 210 and 1,639 points the Ryzen 7 3700X, 204 and 2,112 points. Not far from the Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 7 3700X in multicore on Cinebench R20įor comparison, the Intel Core i5-10600K scores 206 points and 1428 points respectively The Core i7-10700K, 217 and 2,005 points. In single-core, the chip obtains a score of 258 points in multicore, by 2,040 points. The testing platform consists of an ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII HERO motherboard and DDR4-3200 memory. Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Intel Core i5-1145G7 - Benchmarks, Tests and. Cinebench r15 vs r20 windows 7#ago /user/synchronus I rock Windows 7 still (yes I know it's going out of service) so r20 isn't an easy option 5 level 2 3 yr. Note that on Cinebench R15, the Ryzen 5 5600X operates at a slightly overclocked frequency: 4.7 GHz while its benchmarks are 3.7 GHz base and 4.6 GHz in Boost. For normal use I can't answer But if you happen to be screwing about with Linux Cinebench R15 works with wine where as R20 doesn't. Decidedly very cruel, here he is doing it again and fining the Core i5 and i7 from Intel’s Comet Lake-S range on Cinebench R15 er R20. In addition to being won first place on PassMark in single-core (since then he had it stolen by the Ryzen 9 5950X), the 6-core / 12-thread chip of Ryzen 5000 had humiliated the Core i5-10600K on SiSoftware. The test also requires about 4x the memory. We’ve already had a good look at how AMD’s Ryzen 5 5600X performs in recent days. Cinebench R20 uses a much larger and more complex test scene than R15, requiring about 8x the computational power needed to render it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |